<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-08T23:53:14Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/43087" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/43087</identifier>
      <datestamp>2019-12-27T18:52:29Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20191026-052745-0</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-exceptionalism-in-kashmir/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Constitutional Exceptionalism in Kashmir - Acknowledging Both Political Fact and Public Law in the Debate on the Abrogation of Article 370</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Kaushik, Ankit</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2019-10-25</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Constitutional Law</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Jammu &amp; Kashmir</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>State of Emergency</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>The move of India's President to abrogate Article 370 has been subject to much academic debate and discourse along the doctrinaire lines and limits of traditional constitutional law. Since the Declaration was passed, however, in a state of exception, the consequent legal vacuum necessitates an analysis in light of both political facts and public law.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
