<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-11T19:20:57Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/49677" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/49677</identifier>
      <datestamp>2020-06-06T17:58:39Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20200520-013153-0</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/why-egenberger-could-be-next/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Why Egenberger Could Be Next</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Heinig, Hans Michael</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2020-05-19</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>ECJ</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Egenberger</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>federal constitutional court</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Religion</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Staatskirchenrecht</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>Soon, the Federal Constitutional Court will decide on the Egenberger case that raises important questions at the intersection of anti-discrimination law and religious policy. The decision is an opportunity to address critical questions to the European Court of Justice – a court that lacks dogmatic subtlety and sensitivity with regard to religion and cultural policy as an analysis of its case law shows.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
