<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-05-24T15:39:58Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/80622" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/80622</identifier>
      <datestamp>2024-05-26T09:30:50Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/fb65e8e747132955</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/who-is-afraid-of-actio-popularis/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Who is afraid of actio popularis? - On Separating Rights and Remedies in the ECtHR’s Climate Judgment</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Hohnerlein, Jakob</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2024-04-26</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Climate Crisis</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>KlimaSeniorinnen</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Remedies</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Subjective Rights</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Subjektives Recht</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>climate litigation</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Subjektives Recht</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>If, as the German experience suggests, the actio popularis exclusion serves to bar individuals from invoking objective illegality that does not concern rights, while standing of associations is a way to enforce objective legality despite the actio popularis exclusion, it is hard to see why this should have any relevance for the European Convention of Human Rights. Human rights are, after all, rights.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
