<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-05-06T22:13:03Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/85273" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/85273</identifier>
      <datestamp>2024-09-16T08:17:01Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/de46899792b0cd75</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/soft-law-clout/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Soft Law’s Increasing Clout</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Lashyn, Serhii</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2024-09-16</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>CJEU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Soft Law</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Soft law</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Soft law</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>The non-binding nature of soft law is rather self-evident, yet, its influence is growing, as reflected in the recent Jemerak case, decided on 5 September 2024. While the judges in Luxembourg explicitly stated that the Commission’s guidance document had no effect on their interpretation of Union law whatsoever, their decision de facto indirectly reviewed that document. I argue that the Jemerak case exemplifies the growing significance of soft law.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
