2026-04-04T18:11:29Z https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/

oai:verfassungsblog.de/87697 2024-11-26T16:22:16Z posts

http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/5f47d108a3447dd4 https://verfassungsblog.de/protecting-victims-without-mass-surveillance/ Protecting Victims Without Mass Surveillance - A Response to Joachim Herrmann Tuchtfeld, Erik eng 2024-11-26 electronic resource text/html ddc:342 CSAM Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union Constitutional Law ECJ EU Charter Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland Grundrechte Herrmann Joachim | 1956– | Politiker; Minister; Jurist Mass Data Retention Mass Surveillance NCMEC OSINT Survailance Vertrag über die Europäische Union data protection democracy Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland Herrmann Joachim | 1956– | Politiker; Minister; Jurist Vertrag über die Europäische Union Verfassungsblog Verfassungsblog--2366-7044 CC BY-SA 4.0 Mass data retention is on the rise. In the current heyday of security packages in Germany, we are now witnessing a “super grand coalition” in favor of mandatory IP address retention. Some are calling for greater protection for victims through data retention. Yet, what one often overlooks is the following: The investigative capacities of law enforcement authorities have never been better, and the digital data pools that can be analyzed have never been larger. Hence, victims must be protected without mass surveillance.