<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-06T10:32:17Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/94340" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/94340</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-06-16T14:42:42Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/13a335ddac0c6dcc</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/ecj-western-values-gender/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Whose Values? - Rethinking the Use of Values in EU Law Through the CJEU’s “Feminist” Asylum Cases</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Nosrati, Narin</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Tomaselli, Davide</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2025-06-16</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>CJEU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>ECJ</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>European Court of Justice</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt)</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Feminism</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Feminismus [Motiv]</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>asylum</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>gender equality</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>migration law</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt)</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Feminismus [Motiv]</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>Value-based reasoning features prominently in CJEU case law, most recently in AG Ćapeta’s opinion in Commission v. Hungary. However, what is treated as absolute within the Union turns flexible and conditional in cases concerning asylum, integration, as well as anti-discrimination. A closer look at the “feminist” cases (WS, K and L, and AH and FN) reveals how “Western values”-centred reasoning is deployed at the Member State level and re-elaborated by the CJEU as the fundamental value of gender equality – opening the door to ideological reinterpretations.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
