<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-05T22:35:38Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/94392" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/94392</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-06-20T08:52:08Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/1c52113141069436</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/rethinking-article-2-teu/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Rethinking Article 2 TEU - AG Ćapeta’s Opinion in the Context of Recent CJEU Case Law</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Athanasiou, Georgios</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2025-06-20</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Advocate General</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Art. 2 EUV</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Art. 2 TEU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europarecht</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Hungary</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europarecht</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>The recent Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Ćapeta in Case C 769/22 European Commission v Hungary marks a key moment in the evolving case law on Article 2 TEU. The case concerns Hungary’s controversial 2021 legislation restricting access to content portraying or promoting LGBTI identities. This analysis traces how recent ECJ rulings have prepared the ground for this development and examines the Opinion’s implications for the future enforcement of the EU’s constitutional identity.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
