<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-11T14:07:59Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/95574" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/95574</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-07-30T15:57:48Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/ca99ffd63031501e</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/what-the-court-didnt-say/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>What the Court Didn’t Say - The ICJ’s Climate Opinion and the Politics of Judicial Restraint</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Odermatt, Jed</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2025-07-30</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Advisory Opinion</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Climate Crisis</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>ICJ</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>International Court of Justice</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Internationaler Gerichtshof | Den Haag</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Klimakatastrophe</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>climate change</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Internationaler Gerichtshof | Den Haag</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Klimakatastrophe</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>The aim of this blog post is not to summarise the ICJ’s opinion or assess its overall relevance for international law. Instead, it draws attention to some of the issues that the ICJ did not address, or where it might have gone further, by providing more depth, precision, and guidance. By focusing on what the ICJ did not say, we can gain a better understanding of how it navigates its institutional constraints, political sensitivities, and the evolving terrain of international climate litigation.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
