<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-04T02:32:18Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/96624" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/96624</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-12-19T15:54:31Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/0196ece331ceb616</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/epistemic-authority-and-the-right-to-science-in-ao-32-25/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Epistemic Authority and the Right to Science in AO-32/25 - Legal Foundations for the Integration of Traditional Knowledge in the Inter-American System</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>do Amaral Junior, Alberto</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Soares Bicalho, Isabela</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2025-09-05</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Climate Crisis</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>climate litigation</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>indigenous peoples</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>indigenous rights</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Right to Science</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>Traditionally, the right to science as occupied a marginal place within the contentious and advisory architecture of the Inter-American system. However, in its Advisory Opinion–AO-32/25, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights changes this framework by shifting the right to science from a peripheral tool of knowledge dissemination to a central axis of disputes over epistemic authority in public policy formation. This repositioning is not merely about expanding the scope of an undervalued right but about redefining its legal status based on the structural transformations imposed by the climate crisis on the normative production forms and institutional recognition of knowledge.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
