<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-15T20:32:33Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/97789" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/97789</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-10-20T15:47:39Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/bd72637275948d4c</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/european-court-of-human-rights-rule-of-law-and-democratic-governance-decline/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Avoiding Too Little Too Late - How the European Court of Human Rights Can Address Rule of Law and Democratic Governance Decline</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>O'Leary, Síofra</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Grozev, Yonko</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2025-10-20</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>ECtHR</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4). Protokolle usw. (2013 Oktober 2)</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Polen</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Rule of Law</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Russland</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Türkei</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Ukraine</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>judicial blacksliding</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>pilot judgement</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4). Protokolle usw. (2013 Oktober 2)</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Polen</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Russland</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Türkei</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Ukraine</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>It may seem counterintuitive, in the political chaos and noise of 2025, and in the face of widespread disengagement with international law and the different components of the post-war rules-based order, to turn to the nitty gritty of case management, interim measures and procedures. However, the best defense which international courts can mount at present is to do well that for which they were established.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
