<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-16T04:04:38Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/9833" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/9833</identifier>
      <datestamp>2014-11-10T17:34:06Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20170531-123725</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/back-bush-die-us-luftschlaege-syrien-gegen-die-chorasan-gruppe-im-lichte-vorbeugender-selbstverteidigung/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Back to Bush? The US air strikes in Syria against the ‘Khorasan group’ in the light of ‘preventive’ self-defence</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Schiffbauer, Björn</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>ger</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2014-11-09</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>Before the background of the ongoing fight against IS terrorism the US air strikes against the mysterious "Khorasan" group are easily overlooked. Can these attacks be justified by the right of self-defence? Or do they signal a return to the controversial Bush doctrine?</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
