<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-05-05T17:03:48Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/99425" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/99425</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-12-07T12:27:55Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/1ec2dc462dcbe835</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/four-scenarios-and-a-proposal-for-the-future-of-the-echrs-dynamic-case-law-on-asylum/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Four Scenarios and a Proposal for the Future of the ECHR’s Dynamic Case Law on Asylum</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Thym, Daniel</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2025-12-07</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>Seventy-five years after its creation, the European Convention on Human Rights stands at a crossroads. A quarter century of dynamic Strasbourg judgments has significantly expanded rights in asylum and migration, but this very dynamism has produced a “lock-in” effect that limits political room for manoeuvre. This contribution outlines four scenarios for the future development of the case law and the possibilities for transformation.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
