<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-15T07:10:56Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/91195" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/91195</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-05-07T08:47:14Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/cb13eadbe0ff62fe</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/the-crisis-of-critique-in-eu-law/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>The “Crisis of Critique” in EU Law</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Neuvonen, Päivi Johanna</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2025-05-07</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Critical Legal Studies</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU Law</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU legislation</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäische Union | Brüssel Straßburg</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>critical thinking</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäische Union | Brüssel Straßburg</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>Critique has become one of the latest buzzwords in EU legal studies. Who, after all, would not want to be identified as a critical scholar if the danger is that one’s work might otherwise be labelled as reactionary, unsophisticated, naïve or whatever other signifier could be used to demolish the value of scholarly enterprise? But the down-side of this growing interest in being critical as an EU law scholar is that the idea of critique itself is in danger of becoming inflated.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
