<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-03-10T12:38:34Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/92458" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/92458</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-05-07T08:08:21Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/c3e47e83f10056d5</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/ongoing-controversies-over-methods-in-eu-law/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Ongoing Controversies over Methods in EU Law - Towards a Reflexive Turn</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Réveillère, Vincent</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2025-05-07</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Aix-Marseille Université | Aix-en-Provence; Marseille</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäische Kommission | Luxemburg (Stadt) Brüssel</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt)</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäisches Parlament | Brüssel Luxemburg (Stadt) Straßburg</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Methods</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Aix-Marseille Université | Aix-en-Provence; Marseille</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäische Kommission | Luxemburg (Stadt) Brüssel</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt)</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Europäisches Parlament | Brüssel Luxemburg (Stadt) Straßburg</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>Since the publication of last year’s symposium “Controversies over Methods in EU Law”, methodological issues are still pervading contemporary debates in EU law. These ongoing controversies over methods in EU law reflect a broader rethinking of the discipline, influenced by multiple crises in the European Union. These crises have led scholars to question their relationship with the European institutions, which have been central to the development of the core concepts of EU law and of EU law as a disciplinary field.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
