<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-03-15T23:23:39Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:verfassungsblog.de/99854" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://verfassungsblog.de/oai/repository/</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <header>
      <identifier>oai:verfassungsblog.de/99854</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-12-15T21:16:29Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>posts</setSpec>
    </header>
    <metadata>
      <dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
        <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20251216-172012-0</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/two-courts-two-approaches/</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Two Courts, Two Approaches - Climate Justice in the Jurisprudence of the IACtHR and ECtHR</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Severino, Raffaele R.</dc:creator>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:date>2025-09-17</dc:date>
        <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Climate Crisis</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>climate litigation</dc:subject>
        <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
        <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
        <dc:description>The Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Advisory Opinion AO-32/25 marks a major advance in climate jurisprudence. Comparing it with the ECtHR’s 2024 climate rulings, this contribution shows how much further the Inter-American Court goes in recognising the climate crisis as a global emergency, foregrounding equity and climate justice, affirming extraterritorial jurisdiction, broad standing, and ultimately recognising an autonomous human right to a healthy climate.</dc:description>
      </dc>
    </metadata>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
