nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/46b8611eb2d96a84 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240910s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/46b8611eb2d96a84 doi eng 342 23 Ruschemeier, Hannah Author aut Brave New World - Out-Of-Court Dispute Settlement Bodies and the Struggle to Adjudicate Platforms in Europe Ruschemeier, Hannah Verfassungsblog 2024-09-10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The exhilaration and enthusiasm which followed the passing of the Digital Services Act (DSA) is long over. No matter one’s perspective on the DSA, it seems clear that the party is over and the work begins. One of the perhaps oddest provisions of the DSA is Article 21. It calls for the creation of private quasi-courts that are supposed to adjudicate content moderation disputes. User Rights, based in Berlin, is one of the first organisations to assume this role. CC BY-SA 4.0 Article 21 DSA Desinformation Digital Services Act Platform Regulation digital platforms european media freedom act out-of-court dispute settlement (DE-588)4252093-9 gnd Desinformation Quintais, João Pedro Author aut (orcid)0000-0001-6462-2392 Nenadić, Iva Author aut De Gregorio, Giovanni Author aut Eder, Niklas Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/ods-dsa-user-rights-content-moderatin-out-of-court-dispute-settlement/ raw object