<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/bda8dcecc2247532</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/of-minor-benefits-and-major-costs/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Of Minor Benefits and Major Costs - Reformulating the Fundamental Rights Question of the Privatisation of Surveillance in La Quadrature du Net II</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Kuşkonmaz, Elif Mendos</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2024-11-28</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>CJEU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Constitutional Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ECJ</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EuGH</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Proportionality</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt)</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Is general and indiscriminate data retention permissible under the EU fundamental rights framework? In La Quadrature du Net II, the Court tilts the metaphorical scale towards data retention.  The take-away could contribute to the enlargement of privatised surveillance that rests on a generalised pre-emptive data retention scheme. The ECJ’s findings could cement intrusive practices emerging from the counter-terrorism narrative to regular state practice at the expense of fundamental rights protection.</dc:description>
</dc>
