nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20221222-001634-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 221221s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20221222-001634-0 doi eng 342 23 Weill, Rivka Author aut On the Nexus between Separation of Powers and Judicial Power Weill, Rivka Verfassungsblog 2022-12-21 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This exercise in comparative constitutional law shows how, paradoxically, positioning a country on either side of the spectrum of separation of powers structures may lead to similar curtailment of the judiciary’s power, though courts in the two opposing regimes may use very different, and even opposing, judicial doctrines to reach similar non-interventionalist results. Moreover, though scholars typically study these common law judicial doctrines independently of one another, they are all a manifestation of how strong or weak the separation of powers in a given country is. Ultimately, the judicial branch may supplement, but not supplant, the democratically elected political branches, irrespective of the separation of powers in the country in question CC BY-SA 4.0 family reunification Judicial Review separation of powers Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/on-the-nexus-between-separation-of-powers-and-judicial-power/ raw object