nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20220411-131207-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 220411s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20220411-131207-0 doi eng 342 23 Naarttijärvi, Markus Author aut Function creep, altered affordances, and safeguard rollbacks - The many ways to slip on a slippery slope Naarttijärvi, Markus Verfassungsblog 2022-04-11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Alongside the expansion of surveillance regimes, there is a parallel development of equal importance, through what could be described as safeguard rollbacks. These are different from surveillance creep, in that the aim and purpose of surveillance mandates remains largely the same, but the associated safeguards are gradually weakened. These rollbacks have generally taken place where mandates were initially put in place with strict limits to ensure proportionality and legal certainty, but where the effectiveness of those mandates are later argued to be limited due to the safeguards themselves. CC BY-SA 4.0 data protection privacy surveillance Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/os6-function-creep/ raw object