nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/bc7bdb55c90ec8f2 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 260618s2026||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/bc7bdb55c90ec8f2 doi eng 342 23 Greene, Alan Author aut The Judiciary Exits the Scene - The Palestine Action Ban in the England and Wales Court of Appeal Greene, Alan Verfassungsblog 2026-06-18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The Court of Appeal has reversed the High Court's ruling that the proscription of Palestine Action was unlawful. A special five-judge panel found the ban proportionate, affording the Home Secretary wide latitude on national security grounds. The result of the ruling, and its lop-sided account of the separation of powers, is to remove meaningful legal constraint on the Home Secretary’s capacity to proscribe a group for operational effectiveness reasons, even if that group only has minimal engagement with activities that satisfy the definition of terrorism, as well as with respect to invasive national security powers more broadly. CC BY-SA 4.0 anti-terrorism Civil Disobedience Court of Appeal English High Court Palestine Action Right to Protest Lock, Daniella Author aut Murray, Colin Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/palestine-action-ban-in-the-england-and-wales-court-of-appeal/ raw object