<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/75b6a9e3009c10ba</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/palestine-action-sentencing-regime/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Palestine Action and the UK’s Expanded Terrorist-Connection Sentencing Regime - The First Judicial Application of Section 69 Reveals a Constitutional Tension Between Conviction and Sentencing</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Attenborough, Frederick</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-07-06</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Counter-Terrorism and Sentencing Act 2021</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Elbit Systems</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Palestine Action</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Terrorism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>UK</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>UK</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>UK</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The sentencing decision delivered in England on 12 June 2026 in the Palestine Action case marks one of the first prominent judicial tests of a little-noticed but constitutionally troubling provision expanded by the Counter-Terrorism and Sentencing Act 2021, under which terrorism-related consequences such as altered release arrangements, forfeiture orders and long-term notification duties can be attached to ordinary criminal convictions on the basis of a judicial finding made after conviction rather than a jury verdict.</dc:description>
</dc>
