nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/75b6a9e3009c10ba DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 260706s2026||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/75b6a9e3009c10ba doi eng 342 23 Attenborough, Frederick Author aut Palestine Action and the UK’s Expanded Terrorist-Connection Sentencing Regime - The First Judicial Application of Section 69 Reveals a Constitutional Tension Between Conviction and Sentencing Attenborough, Frederick Verfassungsblog 2026-07-06 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The sentencing decision delivered in England on 12 June 2026 in the Palestine Action case marks one of the first prominent judicial tests of a little-noticed but constitutionally troubling provision expanded by the Counter-Terrorism and Sentencing Act 2021, under which terrorism-related consequences such as altered release arrangements, forfeiture orders and long-term notification duties can be attached to ordinary criminal convictions on the basis of a judicial finding made after conviction rather than a jury verdict. CC BY-SA 4.0 Counter-Terrorism and Sentencing Act 2021 Elbit Systems Palestine Action Terrorism UK UK (DE-588)10290328-1 gnd UK Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/palestine-action-sentencing-regime/ raw object