nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200528-013331-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200527s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200528-013331-0 doi eng 342 23 Venizelos, Evangelos Author aut Passive and Unequal: The Karlsruhe Vision for the Eurozone Venizelos, Evangelos Verfassungsblog 2020-05-27 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The decision of the Bundesverfassungsgericht on the European Central Bank’s PSPP program did not come as a shock. All the critical arguments of that decision can be found explicitly or implicitly in the BVerfG’s referral to the Court of Justice of the EU on 18 July 2017. The real object of the decision of the BVerfG is the economic governance of the Eurozone or rather the big bet of European solidarity and European integration, in the midst of a pandemic even. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 BVerfG monetary policy PSPP Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/passive-and-unequal-the-karlsruhe-vision-for-the-eurozone/ raw object