Picking Primacy over Procedural Autonomy Krommendijk, Jasper Author aut (orcid)0000-0002-3371-7580 Text xx# 2022 Verfassungsblog 2022-11-17 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 On 8 November, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘the Court’) decided that national courts are required to ascertain of their own motion whether detention of an illegally staying foreign national or asylum seeker is lawful. This judgment is an example of the ever-growing impact of EU law on national procedural rules, especially in the migration law area. The judgment is also noteworthy because of the difference in approach between, on the one hand, the Court and, on the other hand, the Dutch referring courts and AG Richard de la Tour. CC BY-SA 4.0 Krommendijk, Jasper Migration migration law primacy primacy of EU law 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/picking-primacy-over-procedural-autonomy/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.17176/20221117-215635-0 221117 10.17176/20221117-215635-0 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)