<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/4160dc46660198e6</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/playing-with-fire/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Playing with Fire - Religious Freedom, Civil Society, and State Neutrality in the EU Court of Justice</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Pin, Andrea</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-12-18</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Church-State Relations</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Religionsfreiheit</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>freedom of religion</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>religious freedom</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>religious pluralism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Religionsfreiheit</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The Court of Justice’s narrow understanding of religious freedom under EU law is playing with fire. In the name of anti-discrimination and neutrality, it risks undermining religious freedom in ways that are particularly detrimental to Muslim minorities. At the same time, the Court proceeds as if European constitutional systems were roughly homogeneous, disregarding the profound diversity of church–state relations. This double-blind spot makes the CJEU’s approach not only normatively troubling, but structurally ill-suited to the realities it seeks to address.</dc:description>
</dc>
