<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/4b8af3339ad45dad</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/polands-illegal-judges/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Poland’s “Illegal Judges” - The Court of Justice’s Uneasy Twofold Solution to Address a Long-Festering Rule of Law Problem</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Pech, Laurent</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-04-02</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>CJEU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Case C-521/21</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Poland</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Polen</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rule of Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>illegal judges</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Polen</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>For the first time, the CJEU has called for a “legislative framework” to remedy the systemic problem of irregularly appointed judges in Poland’s judicial system in its judgment of 24 March 2026 in Case C-521/21. Until such time, the CJEU has ruled that neo-judges attached to ordinary courts may only be recused on a case-by-case basis. However, such an individual assessment is not required for the neo-judges appointed to courts of last resort. The CJEU’s twofold approach prioritises system stability over the individual right to effective judicial protection.</dc:description>
</dc>
