<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/85290e2704cede5d</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/procedural-rights-climate-cases-ecthr/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Procedural Rights in Climate Cases Before the ECtHR - From KlimaSeniorinnen to Greenpeace Nordic</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Lumerding, Anna</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Maurer, Melanie</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-06-24</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ECtHR</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Greenpeace Nordic judgment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Klima</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>KlimaSeniorinnen</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>climate litigation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Klima</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>This blog post takes the landmark ruling KlimaSeniorinnen as a starting point to examine the role of procedural rights in climate litigation before the European Court of Human Rights. Procedural rights, as we argue, can be understood in a twofold manner: on the one hand, as admissibility criteria structuring access to the Court, and on the other, as substantive guarantees flowing from the Convention itself. Read in this light, KlimaSeniorinnen – alongside Greenpeace Nordic – reveals key developments in the Court’s emerging climate jurisprudence across both dimensions.</dc:description>
</dc>
