<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/fe9b21f9344b927a</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/protect-the-german-federal-constitutional-court/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Protect the German Federal Constitutional Court! - Lessons from Comparative Law</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Duden, Konrad</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2024-02-13</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>BVerfG-Resilienz</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>BVerfGG</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Constitutional Courts</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Constitutionalisation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Deutschland. Bundesverfassungsgericht | Karlsruhe</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>German Federal Constitutional Court</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>constitutional comparativism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Deutschland. Bundesverfassungsgericht | Karlsruhe</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>For a long time, we felt in Germany as though we were in a world of bliss. While the independence of the judiciary was being attacked in Poland, the USA and most recently in Israel, we were blessed with a strong constitutional court. Over the decades, it has proven to be independent and impartial; it has earned immense trust and respect among the public. However, the independence of the Federal Constitutional Court is built on sand. Now, a public debate has flared up as to whether and how the independence of the Constitutional Court should be protected. A look into other legal systems can contribute to this debate.</dc:description>
</dc>
