nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/5f47d108a3447dd4 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 241126s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/5f47d108a3447dd4 doi eng 342 23 Tuchtfeld, Erik Author aut (orcid)0009-0000-6830-8800 (DE-588)1190605120 Protecting Victims Without Mass Surveillance - A Response to Joachim Herrmann Tuchtfeld, Erik Verfassungsblog 2024-11-26 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Mass data retention is on the rise. In the current heyday of security packages in Germany, we are now witnessing a “super grand coalition” in favor of mandatory IP address retention. Some are calling for greater protection for victims through data retention. Yet, what one often overlooks is the following: The investigative capacities of law enforcement authorities have never been better, and the digital data pools that can be analyzed have never been larger. Hence, victims must be protected without mass surveillance. CC BY-SA 4.0 CSAM Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union Constitutional Law ECJ EU Charter Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland Grundrechte Herrmann Joachim | 1956– | Politiker; Minister; Jurist Mass Data Retention Mass Surveillance NCMEC OSINT Survailance Vertrag über die Europäische Union data protection democracy (DE-588)4619834-9 gnd Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) (DE-588)4072133-4 gnd Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (DE-588)136885659 gnd Herrmann Joachim | 1956– | Politiker; Minister; Jurist (DE-588)4835148-9 gnd Vertrag über die Europäische Union Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/protecting-victims-without-mass-surveillance/ raw object