Protecting Victims Without Mass Surveillance - A Response to Joachim Herrmann
Tuchtfeld, Erik
Author
aut
(orcid)0009-0000-6830-8800 (DE-588)1190605120
Text
xx#
2024
Verfassungsblog
2024-11-26
eng
Mass data retention is on the rise. In the current heyday of security packages in Germany, we are now witnessing a “super grand coalition” in favor of mandatory IP address retention. Some are calling for greater protection for victims through data retention. Yet, what one often overlooks is the following: The investigative capacities of law enforcement authorities have never been better, and the digital data pools that can be analyzed have never been larger. Hence, victims must be protected without mass surveillance.
CC BY-SA 4.0
Tuchtfeld, Erik
CSAM
Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union
Constitutional Law
ECJ
EU Charter
Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt)
Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Grundrechte
Herrmann Joachim | 1956– | Politiker; Minister; Jurist
Mass Data Retention
Mass Surveillance
NCMEC
OSINT
Survailance
Vertrag über die Europäische Union
data protection
democracy
Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union
Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt)
Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Herrmann Joachim | 1956– | Politiker; Minister; Jurist
Vertrag über die Europäische Union
342
https://verfassungsblog.de/protecting-victims-without-mass-surveillance/
Verfassungsblog
2366-7044
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH
10.59704/5f47d108a3447dd4
241126
10.59704/5f47d108a3447dd4
Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
(Revision 1.140 20200717)