nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/92ed9d8e5adaed6a DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 241126s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/92ed9d8e5adaed6a doi eng 342 23 Herrmann, Joachim Author aut More Protection for Victims Through Data Retention - On the Introduction of a Minimum Data Retention Period for IP Addresses After La Quadrature du Net II Herrmann, Joachim Verfassungsblog 2024-11-26 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Mass data retention is all about proportionality. The threat level determines the proportionality of the means – both of which are subject to the perpetual flux of time. Data retention is intended to protect victims of digital crimes. To protect freedom online, our security services urgently need to be able to access stored IP addresses. The alarming developments in our security situation are calling many certainties from the past into question. This also involves a re-evaluation of traffic data retention. CC BY-SA 4.0 CJEU Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union Data Retention Data processingCJEU Deutschland. Bundesverfassungsgericht | Karlsruhe Deutschland. Bundesverwaltungsgericht | Leipzig Berlin ECJ EU European Union Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) Herrmann Joachim | 1956– | Politiker; Minister; Jurist Proportionality data protection (DE-588)4619834-9 gnd Charta der Grundrechte | Europäische Union (DE-588)2117905-0 gnd Deutschland. Bundesverfassungsgericht | Karlsruhe (DE-588)5054870-0 gnd Deutschland. Bundesverwaltungsgericht | Leipzig Berlin (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) (DE-588)136885659 gnd Herrmann Joachim | 1956– | Politiker; Minister; Jurist Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/protection-for-victims-data-retention/ raw object