<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/79f7c06c10c4b437</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/psychological-tests-for-judges-in-italy/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Proposed Psychological Tests for Judges in Italy - Historical Reasons and Constitutional Profiles</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Cocchiara, Emanuele</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2024-06-14</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Italy</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Justice Nomination</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Minnesota-test</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>politicized judiciary</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The recent proposal to introduce psycho-academic tests for access to the judiciary, which in Italy includes both the careers of judge and public prosecutor, has sparked heated clashes and debates between state powers and legal practitioners. But what are the reasons behind this proposal and why is it causing such a stir?</dc:description>
</dc>
