<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/42fc7b300fe7be3e</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/public-lending-copyright-ebook/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Thou Shalt Not E-lend - How a CJEU Decision Caused a Legal, Technological and Market Gridlock</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Margoni, Thomas</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-11-13</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Academic Publishing</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Copyright</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rental and Lending Directive</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Right to education</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Copyright</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The CJEU in the VOB case has offered ample support for the need to include e-lending in the scope of the RLD. This interpretation not only recognises the public interest of society at large in accessing knowledge necessary for cultural, technological and economic development, but also supports authors who, thanks to the derogation of Art. 6 RLD, are entitled to specific remuneration. However, the Court missed the techno-regulatory turn in this story.</dc:description>
</dc>
