<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20170910-214602</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/reconciling-religion-lessons-learned-from-the-triple-talaq-case-for-comparative-constitutional-governance/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Reconciling Religion: Lessons Learned from the Triple Talaq Case for Comparative Constitutional Governance</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Leung, Karlson</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2017-09-10</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>freedom of religion</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Human Dignity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Indian Supreme Court</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Sharia Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The recent case of Shayara Bano v Union of India heard before the Supreme Court of India provide helpful guidance for how a secular democratic regime with a multiplicity of religious, ethnic, and cultural communities can manage constitutional governance with an increasing number of seemingly irreconcilable tensions. Pluralist societies such as Canada and the United States grapple with a variety of delicate balancing acts: in such instance, the need to reconcile accommodation for religious and cultural minorities with the protection of gender rights on the other.</dc:description>
</dc>
