nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20170910-214602 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 170910s2017||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20170910-214602 doi eng 342 23 Leung, Karlson Author aut Reconciling Religion: Lessons Learned from the Triple Talaq Case for Comparative Constitutional Governance Leung, Karlson Verfassungsblog 2017-09-10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The recent case of Shayara Bano v Union of India heard before the Supreme Court of India provide helpful guidance for how a secular democratic regime with a multiplicity of religious, ethnic, and cultural communities can manage constitutional governance with an increasing number of seemingly irreconcilable tensions. Pluralist societies such as Canada and the United States grapple with a variety of delicate balancing acts: in such instance, the need to reconcile accommodation for religious and cultural minorities with the protection of gender rights on the other. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 freedom of religion Human Dignity Indian Supreme Court Sharia Law Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/reconciling-religion-lessons-learned-from-the-triple-talaq-case-for-comparative-constitutional-governance/ raw object