Reconciling Religion: Lessons Learned from the Triple Talaq Case for Comparative Constitutional Governance Leung, Karlson Author aut Text xx# 2017 Verfassungsblog 2017-09-10 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 The recent case of Shayara Bano v Union of India heard before the Supreme Court of India provide helpful guidance for how a secular democratic regime with a multiplicity of religious, ethnic, and cultural communities can manage constitutional governance with an increasing number of seemingly irreconcilable tensions. Pluralist societies such as Canada and the United States grapple with a variety of delicate balancing acts: in such instance, the need to reconcile accommodation for religious and cultural minorities with the protection of gender rights on the other. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Leung, Karlson freedom of religion Human Dignity Indian Supreme Court Sharia Law 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/reconciling-religion-lessons-learned-from-the-triple-talaq-case-for-comparative-constitutional-governance/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.17176/20170910-214602 170910 10.17176/20170910-214602 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)