nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20230928-103349-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 230928s2023||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20230928-103349-0 doi eng 342 23 Leino-Sandberg, Päivi Author aut Recovery and Resilience Facility two years after – quo vadis EU money? Leino-Sandberg, Päivi Verfassungsblog 2023-09-28 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In 2020, at the height of the Covid crisis, the EU embarked on a new path. It extensively borrowed money at capital markets and handed it out to member states. After two years of implementation, it is now possible to make some preliminary conclusions about how that money is being spent. Reading the reports and listening to the hearings in the European Parliament, it becomes abundantly clear that most of it has very little to do with European policies. Rather, spending goes into mundane national budgetary expenditures that may be useful as such but have little genuine European value and little transformational potential. In a time with pressing common European needs, this is not how it should be.   CC BY-SA 4.0 Covid Infrastructure Recovery and Resilience Facility Reform RRF Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/recovery-and-resilience-facility-two-years-after-quo-vadis-eu-money/ raw object