http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/617c9aa77ef3c3ae https://verfassungsblog.de/remedies-as-the-real-test-in-the-gambia-v-myanmar/ Remedies as the Real Test in The Gambia v Myanmar - Full Reparation and the ICJ’s Habit of Saying Less Adnan, Khan Khalid eng 2026-02-18 electronic resource text/html ddc:342 Genocide ICJ internationaln law Myanmar Remedies Rohingya Verfassungsblog Verfassungsblog--2366-7044 CC BY-SA 4.0 The merits hearings in Application of the Genocide Convention (The Gambia v Myanmar) concluded on 29 January 2026, and the Court has entered deliberations, with the judgment date to be announced later. Commentary on this case understandably gravitates to proof, genocidal intent, and whether the ICJ will repeat the caution of its earlier genocide judgments. Those issues matter, but they can obscure a harder question: what does the Court think a genocide judgment is for? The answer is not found in abstract debates about enforceability. It is embedded in remedies.