Remedies as the Real Test in The Gambia v Myanmar - Full Reparation and the ICJ’s Habit of Saying Less Adnan, Khan Khalid Author aut Text xx# 2026 Verfassungsblog 2026-02-18 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 The merits hearings in Application of the Genocide Convention (The Gambia v Myanmar) concluded on 29 January 2026, and the Court has entered deliberations, with the judgment date to be announced later. Commentary on this case understandably gravitates to proof, genocidal intent, and whether the ICJ will repeat the caution of its earlier genocide judgments. Those issues matter, but they can obscure a harder question: what does the Court think a genocide judgment is for? The answer is not found in abstract debates about enforceability. It is embedded in remedies. CC BY-SA 4.0 Adnan, Khan Khalid Genocide ICJ internationaln law Myanmar Remedies Rohingya 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/remedies-as-the-real-test-in-the-gambia-v-myanmar/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.59704/617c9aa77ef3c3ae 260218 10.59704/617c9aa77ef3c3ae Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)