Repasi vs Plaumann - An Individual MEP’s standing before the EU Courts Chamon, Merijn Author aut Eliantonio, Mariolina Author aut (orcid)https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6736-0647 Volpato, Annalisa Author aut (orcid)https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9575-2381 Text xx# 2022 Verfassungsblog 2022-10-18 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 On 10 October 2022 MEP René Repasi lodged an action for annulment against the complementary taxonomy delegated regulation 2022/1214. The same regulation is also challenged by Austria, a privileged applicant under Article 263 TFEU. This post focuses on the issue which MEP Repasi himself has noted is the most innovative of his action, namely the question whether an individual MEP has special legal standing to challenge an act (of the Commission) that affects how that MEP fulfils his parliamentary function. CC BY-SA 4.0 Chamon, Merijn Art. 263 Art. 263 TFEU CJEU European Parliament OLP Plaumann 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/repasi-vs-plaumann/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.17176/20221018-130548-0 221018 10.17176/20221018-130548-0 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)