nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/1c52113141069436 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250620s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/1c52113141069436 doi eng 342 23 Athanasiou, Georgios Author aut Rethinking Article 2 TEU - AG Ćapeta’s Opinion in the Context of Recent CJEU Case Law Athanasiou, Georgios Verfassungsblog 2025-06-20 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The recent Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Ćapeta in Case C 769/22 European Commission v Hungary marks a key moment in the evolving case law on Article 2 TEU. The case concerns Hungary’s controversial 2021 legislation restricting access to content portraying or promoting LGBTI identities. This analysis traces how recent ECJ rulings have prepared the ground for this development and examines the Opinion’s implications for the future enforcement of the EU’s constitutional identity. CC BY-SA 4.0 Advocate General Art. 2 EUV Art. 2 TEU EU Europarecht Hungary (DE-588)10290611-7 gnd EU (DE-588)4153206-5 gnd Europarecht Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/rethinking-article-2-teu/ raw object