nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/ae6a85476fad682c DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240704s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/ae6a85476fad682c doi eng 342 23 Zala, Pruthvirajsinh Author aut Rethinking the History & Tradition Approach - Gun Rights and the US Constitution Zala, Pruthvirajsinh Verfassungsblog 2024-07-04 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In a landmark 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Rahimi that the federal government has the authority to disarm individuals deemed by courts to be credible threats to their partners or children, consistent with the Second Amendment. This ruling marks a significant shift from the Court's previous stance in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), which had established a stringent history and tradition test for evaluating gun regulations that undermined key tenets of the rule of law – clarity, consistency, and predictability. CC BY-SA 4.0 Constitutional Interpretation US Supreme Court Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 gnd Verfassungsauslegung Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/rethinking-the-history-tradition-approach/ raw object