<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20221220-121718-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/rtbf-2022/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Right to be Forgotten in 2022 - Luxembourg judges keep surfing the legislative void</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Gstrein, Oskar J.</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2022-12-20</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>gdpr</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>general data protection regulation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Right to be Forgotten</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>rtbf</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On 8 December 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its latest landmark judgment on the ‘right to be forgotten’. Despite the largely incremental character, the continuing legal manifestation of the right to erasure/be forgotten/de-referencing raises more fundamental questions on the governance of the datafication of society in the EU.</dc:description>
</dc>
