nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/897cdf9085662e91 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250515s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/897cdf9085662e91 doi eng 342 23 Kanyamihanda, Adeodata Author aut Safe for whom? - The Advocate General’s Opinion in LC and LP v Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale di Roma Kanyamihanda, Adeodata Verfassungsblog 2025-05-15 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The EU’s notion of “safe countries of origin” is on increasingly shaky ground. In a recent Opinion, Advocate General de la Tour suggests that a country can still be deemed safe even when specific groups face serious threats there. This reinterpretation breaks with established case law and risks hollowing out core procedural protections for asylum seekers across Europe. It remains to be seen how this stance will influence the delicate balance between efficient processing and safeguarding fundamental rights. CC BY-SA 4.0 European Union Italy Italy-Albania Protocol safe country of origin Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/safe-for-whom/ raw object