<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/b69dde1ed062b555</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/schrodingers-breach/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Schrödinger’s Breach - Preliminary Objections in Alleged Breaches of Certain International Obligations in respect of the Occupied Palestinian Territory</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>McIntyre, Juliette</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-09-11</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Genocide</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ICJ</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>International Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Monetary Gold</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Nicaragua</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>South Africa v. Israel</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On Thursday, 10 September 2026, the oral proceedings regarding Germany’s preliminary objections in the Alleged Breaches of Certain International Obligations in respect of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Nicaragua v. Germany) case concluded. The case already has a complicated history. It is thus perhaps unsurprising that this case has raised some particularly knotty procedural questions. This article attempts to unpack the most important and interesting ones, which were the focus of the oral proceedings.</dc:description>
</dc>
