<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/40c1cd516ac7885c</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/schrodingers-judges/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Schrödinger’s Judges - Challenges to the Rule of Law Restoration in Poland</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Stambulski, Michał</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2024-12-19</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Court of Justice</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Poland</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rechtsstaat</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rule of Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rechtsstaat</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>What happens when judges are both legitimate and illegitimate at the same time? In post-2023 Poland, tension arises between ‘old judges’ (pre-2018), accusing ‘neo-judges’ of ethical compromise, and the new government, which aims to maintain judicial continuity. As a result, neo-judges find themselves in a state akin to Schrödinger's cat, their legitimacy simultaneously affirmed and denied. This paradox encapsulates the broader struggle over judicial authority and political influence in the country.</dc:description>
</dc>
