nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/5619b28e28e014db DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250721s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/5619b28e28e014db doi eng 342 23 Malveaux, Suzette Author aut Stopping the Davids, Shielding the Goliaths - The Supreme Court’s Assault on Collective Justice and the Saga of Birthright Citizenship Malveaux, Suzette Verfassungsblog 2025-07-21 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In Barbara v. Trump, an individual federal district court judge stopped the Administration’s birthright citizenship executive order nationwide. Just when the Supreme Court said this was not allowed in Trump v. CASA, a New Hampshire judge ordered universal relief, this time through a class action. There is a big difference between a nationwide injunction that benefits non-parties and a class action that benefits class members. But what they have in common is that they both empower the “little guy” to enforce the rule of law. The Supreme Court has eliminated the former and is now trying to kneecap the latter. CC BY-SA 4.0 Birthright Citizenship Remedies US Supreme Court USA. Supreme Court access to justice (DE-588)35650-5 gnd USA. Supreme Court Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/scotus-classaction/ raw object