nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/e0248b0afd412bec DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250723s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/e0248b0afd412bec doi eng 342 23 Ahmed, Aziza Author aut Another Step in the Anti-Abortion Agenda - Medina v. Planned Parenthood and its Attack on Civil Rights Ahmed, Aziza Verfassungsblog 2025-07-23 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Trump’s recently passed “One Big, Beautiful Bill” bars Medicaid reimbursements to Planned Parenthood for one year. The provision is now temporarily blocked after Planned Parenthood filed suit. But it builds on, and must be read against, the backdrop of Medina v. Planned Parenthood, a recent and disastrous Supreme Court ruling initiated by South Carolina. The case starkly illustrates the Court’s continued alignment with an anti-abortion agenda advanced through state governments and forms part of a broader assault on civil rights. Not least, its entanglement with Medicaid signals a deeper campaign against the poor and access to healthcare. CC BY-SA 4.0 Abortion Civil Rights Reproductive Backsliding Reproductive Rights US Supreme Court USA. Supreme Court health care intersectionality (DE-588)35650-5 gnd USA. Supreme Court Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/scotus-medina-abortion/ raw object