nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/d8f341a7b69238e6 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 241013s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/d8f341a7b69238e6 doi eng 342 23 Shany, Yuval Author aut Security Considerations, the Duty to End Belligerent Occupations and the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Israeli practices and policies in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Shany, Yuval Verfassungsblog 2024-10-13 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This contribution discusses three possible rationales for the Court’s rejection of the relevance of Israel’s security concerns: Lack of proof of serious and legitimate security concerns by Israel, the insufficiency of broad security concerns to justify the continued use of force, and the insufficiency of broad security concerns to deny realization of Palestinian self-determination. As long as international law doctrine on the duty to end a belligerent occupation despite the prevalence of serious security concerns remains contested, and as long as security conditions in the region remain extremely unstable, it is unlikely that a withdrawal will be deemed practicable CC BY-SA 4.0 Advisory Opinion International Humanitarian Law National Security Westjordanland occupation (DE-588)4065741-3 gnd Westjordanland Cohen, Amichai Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/security-considerations-the-duty-to-end-belligerent-occupations-and-the-icj-advisory-opinion-on-israeli-practices-and-policies-in-the-occupied-palestinian-territory/ raw object