Security Considerations, the Duty to End Belligerent Occupations and the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Israeli practices and policies in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Shany, Yuval Author aut Cohen, Amichai Author aut Text xx# 2024 Verfassungsblog 2024-10-13 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 This contribution discusses three possible rationales for the Court’s rejection of the relevance of Israel’s security concerns: Lack of proof of serious and legitimate security concerns by Israel, the insufficiency of broad security concerns to justify the continued use of force, and the insufficiency of broad security concerns to deny realization of Palestinian self-determination. As long as international law doctrine on the duty to end a belligerent occupation despite the prevalence of serious security concerns remains contested, and as long as security conditions in the region remain extremely unstable, it is unlikely that a withdrawal will be deemed practicable CC BY-SA 4.0 Shany, Yuval Advisory Opinion International Humanitarian Law National Security Westjordanland occupation Westjordanland 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/security-considerations-the-duty-to-end-belligerent-occupations-and-the-icj-advisory-opinion-on-israeli-practices-and-policies-in-the-occupied-palestinian-territory/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.59704/d8f341a7b69238e6 241013 10.59704/d8f341a7b69238e6 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)